Blog

Another opinion on the Armstrong article in Sports Illustrated

Mr RealNikBackTV gives his thoughts in a manner which really breaks down the real question: Who the hell really rides bikes and why would they do that? Through personal observation Mr. RealNikBackTV makes some observations which should be obvious to everyone.

Related posts:

Tags:

20 Responses to “Another opinion on the Armstrong article in Sports Illustrated”

  1. neilroad January 21, 2011 at 4:12 pm #

    Another view of Armstrong / Sports Illustrated article. It asks the real question: Who the hell rides bikes anyways? http://neilbrowne.com/2011/01/another-op

    • ShaunaSmash January 21, 2011 at 4:15 pm #

      RT @neilroad: Another view of Armstrong / Sports Illustrated article. It asks the real question: Who the hell rides bikes anyways? http: …

    • geohiker January 21, 2011 at 4:16 pm #

      RT @neilroad: Another view of Armstrong / Sports Illustrated article. It asks the real question: Who the hell rides bikes anyways? http: …

    • ocomik January 21, 2011 at 4:19 pm #

      @neilroad MrRealNikBackTV just reinforces the “please don’t dominate the rap jack, if you got nothing new to say” lyric #newspeedwayboogie

    • monkeygurly January 21, 2011 at 4:25 pm #

      RT @neilroad: Another view of Armstrong / Sports Illustrated article. It asks the real question: Who the hell rides bikes anyways? http: …

    • twinlinevelo January 21, 2011 at 4:26 pm #

      RT @neilroad: Another view of Armstrong / Sports Illustrated article. It asks the real question: Who the hell rides bikes anyways? http: …

    • dpamac January 21, 2011 at 4:27 pm #

      @neilroad I think he just convinced me to start doing drugs.

      • neilroad January 21, 2011 at 6:12 pm #

        @dpamac Just started?! I’m on ‘roids! You need to catch up!

        • dpamac January 21, 2011 at 6:35 pm #

          @neilroad Shit. Heroin wasn’t the right choice? I wondered why I was sleeping the side of the road reading Naked Lunch.

    • norcali January 21, 2011 at 4:41 pm #

      RT @neilroad: Another view of Armstrong / Sports Illustrated article. It asks the real question: Who the hell rides bikes anyways? http: …

    • norcali January 21, 2011 at 4:42 pm #

      @neilroad that is some funny shit right there.

    • rower1x January 21, 2011 at 5:44 pm #

      RT @neilroad: Another view of Armstrong / Sports Illustrated article. It asks the real question: Who the hell rides bikes anyways? http: …

    • ptrkmrfy January 21, 2011 at 5:44 pm #

      @neilroad Not sure where you found this but this is good, the truth, and I got a good laugh and smile – thanks needed that this Friday

    • ptrkmrfy January 21, 2011 at 5:46 pm #

      RT @neilroad: Another view of Armstrong / Sports Illustrated article. It asks the real question: Who the hell rides bikes anyways? http: …

    • mikwat January 21, 2011 at 5:50 pm #

      RT @neilroad: Another view of Armstrong / Sports Illustrated article. It asks the real question: Who the hell rides bikes anyways? http: …

    • shepdizzle January 21, 2011 at 7:19 pm #

      RT @neilroad: Another view of Armstrong / Sports Illustrated article. It asks the real question: Who the hell rides bikes anyways? http: …

    • crawleykakes January 21, 2011 at 8:57 pm #

      @neilroad http://3scrambledeggs.blogspot.com/2011/

    • districtcycling January 21, 2011 at 9:13 pm #

      RT @neilroad: Another view of Armstrong / Sports Illustrated article. It asks the real question: Who the hell rides bikes anyways? http: …

    • Pub_Cap_Scott January 21, 2011 at 11:32 pm #

      He obviously never met @bahatiracing RT @neilroad It asks the real question: Who the hell rides bikes anyways? http://neilbrowne.com/2011/01/another-op

  2. Mike January 29, 2011 at 1:50 am #

    The investigation of Lance Armstrong isn’t going to resolve anything, the debate will go one forever. See my post on the subject at http://bicyclespokesman.com/the-case-for-lance-armstrong/

Leave a Reply