January 21, 2011

Another opinion on the Armstrong article in Sports Illustrated

Mr RealNikBackTV gives his thoughts in a manner which really breaks down the real question: Who the hell really rides bikes and why would they do that? Through personal observation Mr. RealNikBackTV makes some observations which should be obvious to everyone.

20 comments

January 21, 2011 at 4:12 pm

neilroad says:

Another view of Armstrong / Sports Illustrated article. It asks the real question: Who the hell rides bikes anyways? http://neilbrowne.com/2011/01/another-op…
- January 21, 2011 at 4:15 pm
  
  ShaunaSmash says:
  
  RT @neilroad: Another view of Armstrong / Sports Illustrated article. It asks the real question: Who the hell rides bikes anyways? http: …
- January 21, 2011 at 4:16 pm
  
  geohiker says:
  
  RT @neilroad: Another view of Armstrong / Sports Illustrated article. It asks the real question: Who the hell rides bikes anyways? http: …
- January 21, 2011 at 4:19 pm
  
  ocomik says:
  
  @neilroad MrRealNikBackTV just reinforces the “please don’t dominate the rap jack, if you got nothing new to say” lyric #newspeedwayboogie
- January 21, 2011 at 4:25 pm
  
  monkeygurly says:
  
  RT @neilroad: Another view of Armstrong / Sports Illustrated article. It asks the real question: Who the hell rides bikes anyways? http: …
- January 21, 2011 at 4:26 pm
  
  twinlinevelo says:
  
  RT @neilroad: Another view of Armstrong / Sports Illustrated article. It asks the real question: Who the hell rides bikes anyways? http: …
- January 21, 2011 at 4:27 pm
  
  dpamac says:
  
  @neilroad I think he just convinced me to start doing drugs.
  - January 21, 2011 at 6:12 pm
    
    neilroad says:
    
    @dpamac Just started?! I’m on ‘roids! You need to catch up!
    - January 21, 2011 at 6:35 pm
      
      dpamac says:
      
      @neilroad Shit. Heroin wasn’t the right choice? I wondered why I was sleeping the side of the road reading Naked Lunch.
- January 21, 2011 at 4:41 pm
  
  norcali says:
  
  RT @neilroad: Another view of Armstrong / Sports Illustrated article. It asks the real question: Who the hell rides bikes anyways? http: …
- January 21, 2011 at 4:42 pm
  
  norcali says:
  
  @neilroad that is some funny shit right there.
- January 21, 2011 at 5:44 pm
  
  rower1x says:
  
  RT @neilroad: Another view of Armstrong / Sports Illustrated article. It asks the real question: Who the hell rides bikes anyways? http: …
- January 21, 2011 at 5:44 pm
  
  ptrkmrfy says:
  
  @neilroad Not sure where you found this but this is good, the truth, and I got a good laugh and smile – thanks needed that this Friday
- January 21, 2011 at 5:46 pm
  
  ptrkmrfy says:
  
  RT @neilroad: Another view of Armstrong / Sports Illustrated article. It asks the real question: Who the hell rides bikes anyways? http: …
- January 21, 2011 at 5:50 pm
  
  mikwat says:
  
  RT @neilroad: Another view of Armstrong / Sports Illustrated article. It asks the real question: Who the hell rides bikes anyways? http: …
- January 21, 2011 at 7:19 pm
  
  shepdizzle says:
  
  RT @neilroad: Another view of Armstrong / Sports Illustrated article. It asks the real question: Who the hell rides bikes anyways? http: …
- January 21, 2011 at 8:57 pm
  
  crawleykakes says:
  
  @neilroad http://3scrambledeggs.blogspot.com/2011/…
- January 21, 2011 at 9:13 pm
  
  districtcycling says:
  
  RT @neilroad: Another view of Armstrong / Sports Illustrated article. It asks the real question: Who the hell rides bikes anyways? http: …
- January 21, 2011 at 11:32 pm
  
  Pub_Cap_Scott says:
  
  He obviously never met @bahatiracing RT @neilroad It asks the real question: Who the hell rides bikes anyways? http://neilbrowne.com/2011/01/another-op…
January 29, 2011 at 1:50 am

Mike says:

The investigation of Lance Armstrong isn’t going to resolve anything, the debate will go one forever. See my post on the subject at http://bicyclespokesman.com/the-case-for-lance-armstrong/

Comments are closed.